Professorial dogmas and the future of civic discourse

Professorial dogmas and the future of civic discourse

The passing of Justice Scalia has prompted fitting encomia from the usual courageous stalwarts, predictable political squabbling from the usual squabblers, and cynical posturing from the usual cynics. All very appropriate to the role each of those people plays. But it has also exposed something that strikes me as dark and disconcerting.

Words I have seen associated with Antonin Scalia in the last three days: "bigot," "bigotry," "oppression," "hate," "hateful," "evil," "unjust," and "intolerance." Those all came from professors, scholars of law and subjects related to law whose job it is to seek knowledge of law and legal institutions. And they were written in open letters, blogs, op-eds, and social media postings for their students and the rest of the world to see.

Goldberg denies urging Clinton to bar Albright, Steinem
Massachusetts

Goldberg denies urging Clinton to bar Albright, Steinem

State House News Service

BOSTON – Massachusetts Treasurer Deborah Goldberg, an active supporter of former U.S. secretary of state Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, on Tuesday refuted a report that she had suggested two prominent female surrogates ought to be kept off the campaign trail.

Earlier this month, the New York Times posted an item in its New Hampshire primary campaign notebook reporting that Goldberg said, during a conference call with other elected Clinton supporters, that former secretary of state Madeleine Albright and Gloria Steinem should be "kept away" from Clinton's campaign after comments they made about young female voters supporting Clinton's opponent drew widespread criticism.

Read More