A legislative committee plans to hold a hearing next week on a proposed amendment to the Massachusetts Constitution that would change all uses of the word "he" to "they."
BOSTON — The state's highest court retreated on Tuesday from its long-held stance that a Massachusetts statute banning civilian possession of stun guns is not unconstitutional, marking a rare win for the commonwealth's right-to-bear-arms activists.
Tuesday's decision reflects a March 2016 United States Supreme Court ruling stemming from an appeal filed by a Massachusetts woman named Jaime Caetano, who was charged with a crime by the state after she used a stun gun to ward off an attack from an ex-boyfriend. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito in his concurring opinion noted that "Caetano's mere possession of the stun gun that may have saved her life made her a criminal" in Massachusetts.