Scandal upon ‘Scandal’

Scandal upon ‘Scandal’

After the Christmas finale of the widely popular show "Scandal" aired, the responses were predictable. As is mostly the case in America, commentators from two extremes rushed to the podiums to either vocalize outrage or to proclaim triumph. The outrage had been sparked by the protagonist, Olivia Pope, having an abortion to the tune of Silent Night. The triumph on the other side came from pro-choicers, who reveled in the show's portrayal of Planned Parenthood as a provider of vital health care for women. And, apparently, they saw something courageous and inspiring in the abortion scene. Both sides are off the mark.

Curious about all the fuss, I decided to watch the episode and provide my own pro-life analysis, ready to condemn Pope and Hollywood along with abortion and Planned Parenthood. My personal response to the show ended up different from expected. I sat at my desk, mid-morning on a Wednesday, staring at the final scene of the show to the tune of Ave Maria. "Wow," I thought. "This is so much more complex than I had expected."

Pro-choice / Anti-science
Abortion

Pro-choice / Anti-science

NBP Editorial Board

In 1983, Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote that abortion was on "a collision course" with technology.  Back then, O'Connor could hardly have known the extent to which advances in neonatal science, sonogram technology, and video recording would debunk the claim of abortion advocates that an unborn fetus is not truly human.

More than 30 years after O'Connor authored those prophetic words, our scientific understanding of life in the womb tells a much different story than the narrative offered by abortion rights advocates.

Read More